Windows: ExplorerListGadget (DisplayMode: #PB_Explorer_List) loses its size.

Windows: Macro vs non-existant module bug (6.02 b2).

Windows: 4.0 final - ImageGadget image messes up.

Windows: Prototype bug or code error ?.

Added: ReAssembly (-reasm) support for OS X and Linux. Added: GTK3 IDE build for Linux for testing (purebasic_gtk3). However, I know I still would able to use older PureBasic versions to write programs and many things can be done by API calls and such, but it is at least an inconvenience to be limited to older versions.Ĭode: Select all - Added: HttpTimeout() to set a connection and a global timeout for Http commands.

The only option would be buying new machines with newer computers. They simply don't run with newer Windows versions and the manufacturer don't offer upgrade packages for these older machines. These machines aren't connected to the internet, so safety is not priority. My company is running dozens of computers running on Windows XP (and even Windows 2000). That way if someone for ANY reason need 'win xp' development will use up to the last version ONLY dissagreement i have is that i believe that it should mentiom when official stopped supported XP, 7 etc so will knowįor example is PB5,6 last veriosn fully suport XP? is 5,4 ? 5.0 ?Įqually is PB6 last OFFICIAL and FULLY supported win7 ? If a future PB version dropped the support for legacy OS, older versions would still exist, and they would continue to work as is exactly like an old and unsupported OS. Would that be a reason to limit the 98% left?

Let's imagine that there are millions of XP machines not connected to the internet, enough to amount to 2% of all the computer in use today. BUT, we need to keep new versions of PureBasic compatible with those old machines because they need new features and bug fixes? What am I missing here?Īnd even if I'm missing some key argument there, I don't see how it changes anything. I find this argument very weird, so let me sum it up : very old, unsafe, buggy and features limited versions of Windows are enough for some specific usages, so those machines aren't updated. It doesn't matter what the updates are when you're not connected to anything. That's why there are still a lot of Windows XP (probably much more than 0.4%) and some even Windows.

For ipod download PureBasic 6.03